Compare Insurance PricesEducation first. Price second.

Property

Landlord insurance in Australia

Compare landlord insurance by lining up occupancy (the property is let), which objects are covered, loss-of-rent triggers and waiting rules, malicious and accidental tenant damage, and every excess — then rank only the premiums you were quoted. An owner-occupier home policy is the wrong document for most investor events. We do not publish live prices or name a cheapest insurer.

By Callum SherwoodReviewed by Editorial deskPublished 12 March 2026Last updated 27 September 2026
General information only. General information only — not personal advice. Insurance products differ by insurer, state, eligibility, occupation, medical history, and the wording in the PDS. Always read the PDS, policy schedule, exclusions, limits, waiting periods and duty to take reasonable care not to make a misrepresentation. Seek licensed advice if you are unsure.
Occupancy
Tenanted — not owner-occupied wording
Rent
Loss-of-rent triggers are the product
Damage
Malicious, accidental and wear differ
Objects
Building, landlord contents, or both

Direct answer

What should you compare on landlord insurance in Australia? You compare a landlord wording against other landlord wordings, not against the owner-occupier home quote that looked cheaper on a comparison tile. You line up whether the policy is building, landlord contents, or both; which events stop the rent and for how long the wording will pay; how malicious damage, accidental tenant damage, and ordinary wear are separated; whether flood is on the schedule; and which excesses apply to property damage versus rent. Then you rank the premiums you were actually offered for that configuration.

This page is general information for people who let residential property. It is not property-investment advice, tenancy-law advice, or a recommendation of any insurer. The disclaimer is the legal boundary.

Landlord wording is the aisle — home wording is the wrong document

The AIO question is “what do I compare?” The first row is occupancy.

An owner-occupier home policy is designed around a household that lives in the building. A landlord (or landlords, investment, rental) policy is designed around a building that is let. Marketing names vary. The application question “is the property rented?” is not trivia. Answering “owner occupied” on an investment property to keep a price is a misrepresentation problem, not a negotiation tactic. Australians have a duty to take reasonable care not to make a misrepresentation.

If a quote path will only sell you a home product, you do not have a landlord quote. Write “different product” on the sheet and stop calling it cheaper.

Short-stay and holiday letting can be a third aisle again. Some landlord wordings exclude or restrict Airbnb-style use. Some require a different product. If guests turn over weekly, say so on the form and expect the wording — and the price — to change.

What a landlord policy is usually asked to do

Investors typically buy cover for some mix of these jobs. None of them is automatic just because the word “landlord” appears on the schedule.

Building. The structure, as defined, at a rebuild sum insured. Underinsurance is the same quiet disaster it is for owner-occupiers. A cheap premium on a low rebuild figure is a thinner product. Read underinsurance.

Landlord contents. Carpets, curtains, appliances and furniture you own in the rental. This is not the tenant’s contents. Tenants need their own contents conversation. If the property is unfurnished, the contents sum may be small; it is still worth defining.

Loss of rent / rent default / prevention of access. This is the clause many investors think they bought, and the clause that varies most. Some wordings pay rent when an insured building event (fire, storm) makes the place uninhabitable. Some add default when a tenant stops paying, often after conditions about the lease, the bond, and tribunal steps. Some add death of a tenant or murder/suicide scenarios with their own limits. Waiting periods, vacancy periods, and “you must have a written lease” conditions are the product.

Malicious damage by tenants (and sometimes their guests). Deliberate damage can be covered, capped, or excluded. It is not the same as accidental damage, and it is not the same as poor cleaning at the end of a lease.

Accidental damage. Optional on many wordings. A cheaper quote that omits it is not a like-for-like comparison with a quote that includes it.

Legal expenses or liability. Injury at the property, or some tenancy legal costs, may appear as extra benefits. They have their own exclusions. They are not a substitute for complying with state tenancy law or for holding the certificates a lender asked for.

Line these jobs up as separate rows. Then apply the same how to compare order you use on any other family: event, documents, mechanics, premium last.

Loss of rent — triggers, waiting rules and the bond

Treat loss of rent as its own mini-product.

Ask, and write the answers from the PDS:

  • Which events start a rent claim — insured building damage, tenant default, prevention of access by an authority, or a short list?
  • Is there a waiting period or a minimum number of days in arrears before default cover responds? Waiting periods are explained as a mechanic on waiting periods; landlord default clauses are a common place they hide.
  • Must you have collected a bond, used a written agreement, and followed a listed recovery process?
  • Is the weekly rent on the schedule the current rent, and is there a maximum number of weeks?
  • Does cover pause or end if the property is vacant beyond a stated period, or if you are renovating between tenants?
  • Does a damage excess also apply before rent starts, so you are funding repairs and an empty week at once?

A cheaper landlord quote that only pays rent after an insured fire is not comparable to a quote that also contemplates default. Do not let a single “loss of rent included” tick flatten that difference.

We will not invent a typical weekly cap or a typical waiting period. Those are live product facts.

Tenant damage is not one clause

Assessors and landlords use plain English. Policies use categories.

Wear and tear, poor housekeeping, and fair depreciation are commonly excluded. A stained carpet at the end of a four-year tenancy may be a bond conversation, not an insurance event.

Accidental damage (if covered) is sudden and unintended — a different story from a hole kicked in a door.

Malicious or deliberate damage needs evidence of intent in many wordings, and may exclude damage by someone you authorised to live there unless a tenant-damage option is on risk.

Contamination (methamphetamine is the example people search) may be a special exclusion, a sub-limit, or an extra. Do not assume a standard malicious-damage clause includes a remediation bill of that type.

Photograph the property at every tenancy start, keep condition reports, and keep correspondence. Those habits are claims infrastructure. They also belong in the comparison: ask how the insurer expects you to prove the “before” state. Claims basics is the general map.

Weather, flood and the same nouns as home cover

A tenanted roof still faces storm. A tenanted ground floor still faces flood. Landlord building chapters use the same weather vocabulary as owner-occupier chapters: storm, flood, storm surge, actions of the sea. They are not synonyms. Confirm flood on the landlord schedule. The home hub walks the definitions; do not skip that literacy because the occupants pay you rent.

Maintenance exclusions still apply. A landlord who defers guttering and roof work can meet a “wear and tear” or “failure to maintain” argument after a wet week. Insurance is not a substitute for the repairs a tenancy already required.

Excesses, sums and the cashflow of an empty week

Landlord excesses can be split: a property-damage excess, sometimes a separate rent-default excess, sometimes an imposed excess after claims. Stack them on the sheet. Read excess versus premium before you raise the excess to win a cheaper invoice you cannot fund when a tenant leaves and a room needs repair in the same fortnight.

Sums insured remain rebuild cost for the building and a realistic figure for landlord contents. Bank valuation is not rebuild cost. A lender’s “must have landlord insurance” letter is not a sum-insured calculator.

Feature checklist (not a league table)

Question to line upWhy it mattersWhere to look
Landlord vs owner-occupier wordingWrong aisle = wrong eventsProduct name + application
Short-stay / holiday letCan void a residential-landlord policyUse questions
Building sum insuredUnderinsurance on rebuildSchedule + rebuild estimate
Landlord contentsYour furniture, not the tenant’sContents chapter
Loss-of-rent triggersFire-only vs default vs accessRent / additional benefits
Rent waiting rules and weeksTime and money before a benefitPDS tables
Bond and lease conditionsDefault cover often requires processClaims conditions
Malicious vs accidental vs wearThree different outcomesDamage definitions
Flood and stormWeather is independent of tenancyWeather chapter
Stacked excessesDamage plus rent excessesExcess section

No prices in that table. Fill them from quotes. Methodology is why we will not rank funds.

Questions to ask before you rank premiums

  1. Is this wording landlord, and did I answer “tenanted” on every form?
  2. If the tenant stops paying, what conditions and waiting rules apply — or is rent only paid after an insured building event?
  3. Is accidental tenant damage on this quote, or only malicious, or neither?
  4. What weekly rent and what maximum weeks sit on the schedule?
  5. Is flood included on this investment postcode?
  6. When was the rebuild sum last checked?
  7. Does my lease, condition report and bond process match what the PDS requires after a default?
  8. If I switch, is the new policy in force before I cancel the old one — including rent cover, not only building?

If you cannot make two quotes match on those rows, they are different products.

PDS, tenancy documents and exclusions

Collect the PDS, schedule and endorsements. Search for “landlord”, “rent”, “tenant”, “malicious”, “vacant”, “flood”, and “we will not”. The PDS guide is the reading method.

Keep the tenancy agreement, entry condition report, rent ledger, and tribunal paperwork with the policy. Some claims fail on process, not on the weather chapter.

Exclusions that investors meet include unoccupancy beyond a stated period, illegal use, poor maintenance, and damage that is really end-of-lease cleaning. Read them against how you actually manage the property — self-managed or through an agent. An agent’s carelessness is not automatically the insurer’s problem.

If a dispute leaves the insurer’s internal process, AFCA is the usual external forum for many general-insurance complaints. Tenancy disputes themselves often sit in a state tribunal, which is a different door.

What we will not tell you

We will not name a cheapest landlord insurer. We will not guess a typical premium as a percentage of annual rent. We will not say “you must have loss-of-rent default cover” — that is a risk tolerance and cash-reserve question we cannot answer for you. We will not interpret your state’s tenancy Act.

For official insurance education, use MoneySmart. For a placeholder commercial path, use Compare home cover knowing it is a stub.

After you buy

Check the schedule: address, tenanted occupancy, sums, rent figure, flood, extras, excesses. When rent increases, when the property goes vacant, when you switch from long-term to short-stay, or when you start a renovation, treat that as a mid-term conversation. A cheap renewal that still thinks last year’s tenant is in place is unfinished business.

Frequently asked questions

What should I compare on landlord insurance?

Match that the wording is landlord (not owner-occupier), the building versus landlord-contents split, loss-of-rent events and any waiting or vacancy rules, malicious and accidental tenant damage, flood and storm definitions, sum insured, and stacked excesses. Then compare the premiums those configurations produced. A cheaper owner-occupier quote is not a landlord comparison.

Is landlord insurance the same as home insurance?

No. Both may cover a building, but landlord products are built around a tenanted risk — loss of rent, tenant-related damage, and sometimes legal expenses. A standard home policy assumes you live there. Using the cheaper home quote on an investment property is a document error, not a saving.

Sources and further reading